It's a reasonable assertion.
I've not had any problem with scratching in the past. I've not had any
output from a 7600 either.
I assume you read the Pictorico manager's assertion reposted on this list
that the stock is the same, with the exception of a very slight decrease in
coating, which he claimed would make no difference. This could be the
difference resulting in scratching. The stock looks and feels the same as
the stuff I was buying with Pictorico on the label though.
Anyone else using AccuArt2 on a roll having this problem?
Jon
At 08:01 PM 7/9/2004, Sandy King wrote:
>Hi Jon,
>
>I have not had any problem with scratching or abrasion in making inkjet
>negatives on Pictorio with the Epson 2000P, 2200 and C-84. I simply handle
>the negatives with reasonable care and have never had a problem.
>
>Since the Epson 7600 is supposed to use the same inks as the 2200 I am
>wondering if perhaps the AccuArt2 material is not Pictorico?
>
>Sandy King
>
>
>
>
>>Never got a response on this, so I'm trying again.
>>
>>Does anybody do any post-printing techniques to their inkjet negs to
>>increase the durability and prevent scratching? A (non-UV Inhibiting)
>>spray of some sort maybe?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Jon
>>
>>At 07:50 PM 7/7/2004, Jon Lybrook wrote:
>>>I've noticed the Pictorico (now AccuArt2) transparencies I've been
>>>getting from the Epson 7600 my friends have are very fragile and scratch
>>>way-easily. Are there any protective coatings or post printing
>>>procedures for making them a little more durable?
>>>
>>>TIA,
>>>Jon
Received on Fri Jul 9 20:09:40 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 08/13/04-09:01:11 AM Z CST