Re: Thinking of building a UV contact box...

Thanks for the response.

It has been a while since I did any wet enlarging work.

I am thinking of contact printing some (hopefully) digital contact
negatives.

>From some quick research, it would seem that AZO in Amidol might
be a good combo. Any comments? Any preferred vendor for the AZO or
Amidol? I noticed Photog's Forumulary has a couple of Amidol paper
developers, one entitled something like "Weston's"- not sure which
one I should probably start with.

Thanks for the help!!!

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:59:34AM -0400, Sandy King wrote:
> Highly effective, but printing times would be incredibly short, much
> too short to be practical in my estimation. If you want to contact
> print with traditional silver papers just hang a light bulb three or
> four feet from the printing frame. I have printed with AZO this way
> and exposure times are in the 5-10 second range with a 65 watt R40
> bulb. And AZO is much slower than silver papers destined for
> projection printing. For regular silver printing a five or ten watt
> bulb will probably provide all the light you need.
>
> Sandy Kig
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >Aside from some of the alt.processes, will a uv or Black light box be
> >very effective at also contact printing on traditional silver paper?
>
Received on Thu Jul 29 09:33:08 2004