Richard, very sorry about the misleading implication. The number you gave
me got right through (after talking to the computer and insisting that I
wanted to know about mailers). However, the real person I finally talked to
gave me another number, who then gave me another number. I guess I just
wanted to spare you all the details.
n
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Kodak Mailers
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nick Makris" <nick@mcn.org>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 3:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Kodak Mailers
>
>
> > Eric, earlier Richard K. suggested to contact Kodak (he
> supplied an 800 #),
> > which I did. After several attempts and persuading
> someone who wanted my
> > account number (which I don't have) that I simply wanted
> to know if the
> > mailers were still honored, I was able to find out they
> still honor them and
> > that the address they should be sent to is in NJ
> >
> > Kodak Processing Lab
> > 16-31 Route 208
> > Fairlawn NJ 07410
> >
> > If anyone want's these mailer's let me know.........
> >
> > n
> >
> The number I posted is Kodak's customer service number. I
> am surprized they asked you for an account number. The
> "professional" division is extension 19. I haven't had to
> call for a while, maybe Kodak has changed things, as usual
> for the worse.
>
> ---
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@ix.netcom.com
>
>
>
Received on Mon Jun 14 17:32:00 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 07/02/04-09:40:14 AM Z CST