Re: enlarged negs - questions on process

From: Fotoalquimia ^lt;info@fotoalquimia.com.ar>
Date: 03/12/04-08:39:53 AM Z
Message-id: <000201c40879$f8ec0960$acc7f4d8@osky>

Marek:
IŽd like to share those tricks.

Osky

----- Original Message -----
From: <mmatusz@pdq.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: enlarged negs - questions on process

> Ian
> I have been doing the direct reversal negatives for over a year now. I am
> sold on it. It is very easy to tune your Dmax to the process you are
> working with, the lith film is cheap so you don't feel bad about
> experimenting to get the best negative. I have a few tricks that I
> gathered that I would be happy to pass along if you decide to get into it.
> Marek
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Any thoughts or comments on the relative advantages, benefits,
> > difficulties
> > between using a interpositive to enlargement method compared to a direct
> > reversal enlargement?
> >
> > I've been reading articles on both methods (good ones at
> > unblinkingeye.com)
> > and it seems to me the direct reversal method eliminates a step of loss,
> > dust gathering, etc. But the theoretical observations of someone who
> > hasn't tried a process are often wrong. ;)
> >
> > Feedback much appreciated as I'd like to start ordering film and stuff
in
> > the next few days.
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Ian Greant
> >
> >
> >
> >
Received on Fri Mar 12 15:47:32 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 04/01/04-02:02:05 PM Z CST