Re: Judy Seigel Ruined My Day!

. . . and what about a grant? A staff? What about building this into a
perpetuated organ?

S. Shapiro
----- Original Message -----
From: "PhotoGecko" <gecko@photogecko.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: Judy Seigel Ruined My Day!

> So, I don't recall anybody asking Judy Why?
>
> . . . Why is #9/10 the last issue (or issues)?
>
> I don't recall anything in the list, or in the issue(s) either, which
would
> give a hint as to why living scholarship (re alt process, anyway) must
die.
>
> Curious minds want to know.
>
> Hasta,
> John
> ______________________
> John Campbell
> PhotoGecko Studios and Gallery
> 1413 S 1st Street
> Austin (by Gawd!) Texas 78704
> 512.797.9375
>
> Intelligence note: at no point were Weapons of Mass Destruction ever
> mentioned in this electronic communication.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Judy Seigel" <jseigel@panix.com>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Judy Seigel Ruined My Day!
>
>
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 16 May 2004, steves wrote:
> >
> > > Gosh, I got my copy a day late, and all those short dollars, too.
> Aren't we
> > > gonna get a number 10? Pleeeease!!!
> >
> >
> > Actually, Steve, I forgot to mention that this was a double issue, #9 &
10
> > together.... Fifty-six pages, plus the 4 page Sources & Services insert
> > comes to 60 pages, but I crammed so much into every page -- notice how
the
> > type is smaller and the leading tighter than usual, even the margins got
> > shaved... so it's actually more than 60 pages. If I weren't such a
sport,
> > I'd charge extra....
> >
> > meanwhile, thanks for caring,
> >
> > J.
> >
>
>
>
Received on Thu May 20 01:08:36 2004