Re: jibber jabber - naive

Wow. I think I'm naive! What a waste of time that (the 'trolling') sounds like!

But....

Thanks to everyone for the dag. suggestions. After much emailing and
searching I found a workshop next August. I'm going to try to get to it!
But, a question (one which might be quite controversial).....what is the
downside to the 'safer' dag method (the one without the mercury....the one
that I don't know how to spell!). I'm assuming that the more dangerous, the
better, more refined, the results. The biggest reasons, to me, to do dags
is the virtual grainless appearance.....the perfection in image, the
pursuit if perfection itself! Thoughts? Opinions? Facts? Anyone?

At 07:40 AM 11/19/2004 -0800, you wrote:
>Best intentions - perhaps to a great degree?? However, I want to remind
>everyone that on more than one occasion we have found an "echo troll' on
>this and other lists. For anyone that doesn't recognize the reference "echo
>troll", it's effectively one person with two different emails subscribed to
>a given list or two different people working together under the plan of "you
>lie and I'll swear to it".
>
>My two cents,
>
>Nick
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Marie Wohadlo" <mwohadlo@press.uchicago.edu>
>To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
>Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 7:23 AM
>Subject: jibber jabber
>
> > I guess we just have to believe that we all have the best intentions,
>right?
> >
> >

Marie Wohadlo
Electronic Publishing Specialist, Information Technology
Office phone: (773) 753-3374 Office number: 374C Wing: 3E
email: mwohadlo@press.uchicago.edu
Received on Fri Nov 19 09:49:50 2004