Re: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)

Loris

I think this confirms what has been said and tried earlier - I think by Judy
in PF # 6 - that it is possible to do one-layer-prints and get a long
beatifull scale - without sizing.

You have to redo this test but with sized paper - my experince is that the
sizing makes this tonal range shorter - but then again I am using potassium
dichromate , different paper , cold climate, taking different language
etc. - and I only get typically 7-8 steps - on a 21-Stouffer.

Roman

----- Original Message -----
From: "Katharine Thayer" <kthayer@pacifier.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)

Looks good to me. I agree with Joe that I don't see pigment stain, and
if there's dichromate stain it's very mild.
Katharine

On Dec 1, 2005, at 12:24 PM, Loris Medici wrote:

> BTW, I've uploaded the scan of the test. Any comment would be appreciated.
>
> http://www.loris.medici.name/Gum-Test-01.jpg
>
> It looks like there's some staining (unsized Whatman HP watercolor
> paper) -
> both pigment and dichromate stain (the latter being greenish - I guess it
> will clear in metabisulfite... But I will try to size the paper first).
>
> Regards,
> Loris.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loris Medici [mailto:loris_medici@mynet.com]
> Sent: 01 Aralık 2005 Perşembe 21:47
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: RE: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)
>
> Hi Katherine. I was talking about one color / one layer of the tricolor.
> The
> test I did was one coat, one color. I mention tricolor just because I'm
> making tests in order to make tricolors in the future.
> ..
>
Received on Thu Dec 1 23:31:30 2005