Re: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)

I posted this yesterday but somehow it didn't return to me (also it
didn't show up in the list archives). So I'll post it again. Sorry if
you get this for the second time.

-----Original Message-----
From: Loris Medici [mailto:loris_medici@mynet.com]
Sent: 05 Aralık 2005 Pazartesi 11:42
To: 'alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca'
Subject: RE: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)

Thanks for the points you mentioned. They will be taken into account.

The list is a wonderful source of information to me. There's no better
way of learning gum by making tests "after" reading the great deal of
information provided in PFPh. + numerous contributions (and websites)
from list members.

You all are great people. Thanks for sharing your experience and
knowledge.

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Seigel [mailto:jseigel@panix.com]
Sent: 03 Aralık 2005 Cumartesi 09:34
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: RE: Why multiple exposure (was Re: (Gum) Tonal scale)

...
I also notice the small -- but important -- details of process this
discussion brought out. 10 years ago there was nothing like it.

J.
Received on Tue Dec 6 01:59:15 2005