Re: Paper negative???

From: henk thijs ^lt;henk.thijs@hetnet.nl>
Date: 12/12/05-04:04:08 PM Z
Message-id: <6a0e0bddc499a696dc2cf9cf188606dd@hetnet.nl>

Hi Yves,
If you would look after the archives you would find a lot of discussion
concerning paper-negatives.
The ones before the digital revolution:

On thin FB-paper (like the Kentmere DocArt): this one could be waxed by
ironing with parafin;
or made transparent by applying sunfloweroil. According to Peter
Fredericks the sunfloweroil was the best of oils to use.
There were even 'how-to-do' for using RC-paper , by separating the
front from the back, leaving more or less a transparent neg.; I never
succeeded to do this.

The digitals made on inkjet printer I prefer the Simili Japon 140 grs
and sunfloweroil for transparence.

Just the supermarket on the corner I ask for 50x75 cm prints for 8
USDollar on (Fuji?) color paper. This paper is without a printed logo
on the backside.

Apart from 'normal' negs on Arista lith film I use the different negs
for gum and oil-printing.
For cyanotypes only the lith-negs.

Exposure times for my equipment: the waxed negs about 2 times the
lith-film-negs.
The 'around-the-corner-color-negs' about 10 times the ltith-film-neg.
Cheers,
Henk

Op 12 dec 2005 om 16:50 heeft Yves Gauvreau het volgende geschreven:

> Hi,
>  
> I have seen a few time that paper negative can be and are used to make
> prints. I said prints because I assume they can be used with most if
> not all process. I'd like to know a bit more on this subject like what
> kind of "qualities" the paper must have and all other useful stuff you
> may think of.
>  
> Thanks
> Yves
------------------------------------
www.thijs-foto.com
------------------------------------
Received on Mon Dec 12 22:17:36 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/05/06-01:45:10 PM Z CST