Hi Lain,
Would you please share your source for the 40w tubes.
Thanks,
Ginni
At 10:04 AM 2/14/2005, you wrote:
>Thanks to all for your various responses. In my haste I did forget to
>mention which processes I am interested in. To begin with I am doing
>cyantotypes as I feel this has fewer variables than some other processes.
>Once I feel I have this under some sort of control I expect to also start
>gum soon after.
>
>I think I will pursue the fluorescent tube approach, in part because I
>think it will prove more convenient to have my source enclosed in a
>smallish box. That said I have another question:
>
>Is more UV generally better? I have found a source for 40w tubes of the
>same size as the 20w I have been considering. Apart from more heat is
>there any reason not to prefer these?
>
>Thanks again
>
>Iain
>
>
Ginni Savalli
Academic Administrator
Stanford University/Petroleum Engineering Dept.
Voice: (650) 723-8314
Fax: (650) 725-2099
Green Earth Sciences 063
367 Panama Street
Stanford, CA 94305
MC: 2220
email: gsavalli@pangea.stanford.edu
Received on Mon Feb 14 12:24:21 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/01/05-02:06:54 PM Z CST