At 18:23 14/02/2005, you wrote:
>Hi Lain,
>Would you please share your source for the 40w tubes.
>Thanks,
>Ginni
This is in the UK so may not be of use to you:
They are about 30% more than I can find the regular ones elsewhere.
>At 10:04 AM 2/14/2005, you wrote:
>>Thanks to all for your various responses. In my haste I did forget to
>>mention which processes I am interested in. To begin with I am doing
>>cyantotypes as I feel this has fewer variables than some other processes.
>>Once I feel I have this under some sort of control I expect to also start
>>gum soon after.
>>
>>I think I will pursue the fluorescent tube approach, in part because I
>>think it will prove more convenient to have my source enclosed in a
>>smallish box. That said I have another question:
>>
>>Is more UV generally better? I have found a source for 40w tubes of the
>>same size as the 20w I have been considering. Apart from more heat is
>>there any reason not to prefer these?
>>
>>Thanks again
>>
>>Iain
>>
>Ginni Savalli
>Academic Administrator
>Stanford University/Petroleum Engineering Dept.
>Voice: (650) 723-8314
>Fax: (650) 725-2099
>Green Earth Sciences 063
>367 Panama Street
>Stanford, CA 94305
>MC: 2220
>email: gsavalli@pangea.stanford.edu
Received on Mon Feb 14 13:17:50 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/01/05-02:06:54 PM Z CST