Re: ULF photography

From: sanking@CLEMSON.EDU
Date: 01/16/05-05:33:32 PM Z
Message-id: <2942.200.95.57.48.1105918412.squirrel@200.95.57.48>

Steve,

I will not be back from Mexico until Wednesday evening. By this weekend I
would be able to send you some developing times for seme-stand development
with a number of films, and also edit the last version of your manuscript.
If you can wait until then, of course. Sorry, but I won't be able to do
anything until then for the article.

Best,

Sandy

People involved in ULF photography already know what the letters stand for.

Sandy

>
>
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Patrick Jan Van Hove wrote:
>
>> getting as many people as possible interested in ULF photography and
>
>
> Ultra Low Format?
>
> Used Lens Fetish?
>
> Uncontrolled Light File?
>
> Using Loss of Field?
>
> Unified Life Force?
>
> Others, too numerous to mention....?
>
> However, getting others interested may be counterproductive: quick route
> to passe.
>
>
> Judy
>
Received on Sun Jan 16 17:33:32 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/01/05-09:28:08 AM Z CST