Re: ULF photography

From: sanking@CLEMSON.EDU
Date: 01/17/05-11:44:10 AM Z
Message-id: <2284.200.95.57.11.1105983850.squirrel@200.95.57.11>

Sorry, this was a personal message not intended for the list and it has
nothing to do with the question about ULF.

Sandy

> Steve,
>
> I will not be back from Mexico until Wednesday evening. By this weekend I
> would be able to send you some developing times for seme-stand development
> with a number of films, and also edit the last version of your manuscript.
> If you can wait until then, of course. Sorry, but I won't be able to do
> anything until then for the article.
>
> Best,
>
> Sandy
>
> People involved in ULF photography already know what the letters stand
> for.
>
>
> Sandy
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Patrick Jan Van Hove wrote:
>>
>>> getting as many people as possible interested in ULF photography and
>>
>>
>> Ultra Low Format?
>>
>> Used Lens Fetish?
>>
>> Uncontrolled Light File?
>>
>> Using Loss of Field?
>>
>> Unified Life Force?
>>
>> Others, too numerous to mention....?
>>
>> However, getting others interested may be counterproductive: quick route
>> to passe.
>>
>>
>> Judy
>>
>
>
Received on Mon Jan 17 11:44:25 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/01/05-09:28:08 AM Z CST