Re: tempera interests

mixed as in crap and crappier. I still have not found a curve I really like
specific to this process. Also I have being testing various coating methods.
  Glas rod wrapped seems to be the best so far. Although Peters suggested
method of the roller has merit I am just missing something as I dont like
the texture it leaves. It alsmost looks like reticulation in 3d.
...Normally I would also use amm dich, last round I had pot dich already and
thought I would test.

T
>From: Alex Chater <alex.chater@macunlimited.net>
>Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>Subject: Re: tempera interests
>Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:57:17 +0000
>
>
>Personally I use Ammonium dichromate for this process. It is faster. What
>do
>you mean by mixed results?
>
>Alex
>
>----------
> >From: Tim O'Neill <rivervalleyimages@msn.com>
> >To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> >Subject: tempera interests
> >Date: Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 6:46 PM
> >
>
> >
> > I have been printing more tempera today with mixed results. I am however
> > getting closer. Seems I had old sensitizer the lst go around so results
>we
> > not there at all. Sensitizer will lose its punch. This was Pot Dich
>and 4
> > mos old at room temp in a brown bottle. On another note for any
>printmakers
> > out there. In expermenting with lupo I was curious if I could come up
>with
> > a icc profile for it. When I ran it through my Epson I got the expected
> > wheel tracks ect from printing on a pretty non- absorbant surface. I
>took
> > that image and sandwhiched it with a piece of fine art paper and ran a
> > brayer across it (just like a monoprint) and it transferred with really
> > interesting results
> >
> > Tim O'Neill>
> >
> >
Received on Sun Jan 16 21:29:03 2005