> There is no way Robert M. is a reliable source. BUT! I may well call
Kodak
> ... gee, as if no one on this list has ever thought of that. And . . . I
> shall get back to you all.
So, Steve-o, what did I post requires any verification? I only commented on
what I read and how it should not be trusted unless verified. BTW, I have
already asked Kodak for more information. Apparently, the AP story confirms
Richard's comments, so unless AP is incorrect, I will take Richard's word.
Although, just because AP said it does not mean it entirely accurate. There
are plenty examples of stories being wrong.
Bob
Received on Wed Jun 15 21:56:30 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 07/07/05-11:30:54 AM Z CST