You make a very good point.
However, assuming that the radiums of the curve is set at 2.0 log
units from 0.1 over B+F this leaves us still well within the exposure
scale of pure palladium, which is in the 1.75-1.85 range.
Still, I am inclined to agree with you that a better indication of
effective printing density might be obtained if we were to extend the
radius of the curve beyond log 2.0.
Sandy
>
>If, as Richard says, the length of the portion of the curve for which
>the slope is calculated to arrive at CI was set at 2.0 because that
>range was deemed adequate to cover conventional printing materials,
>does it make sense to apply it to platinum, which has a longer range?
>
>
>
Received on Sun Oct 2 21:36:14 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 11/07/05-09:46:18 AM Z CST