OHMAGOSH john,
The 2400 is wonderful. I just finished printing my 10th and final 13x19
negative and ran out of ink on one of the cartridges....and I've printed 9
of those negs in palladium and the ink is extremely dense, except for the
black ink which is less dense than the 2200. However, I am not using black
ink, only colored inks. So, as far as I am concerned, the printer is PERFECT
(except for the price--$800).
Chris
> Chris,
> I read somewhere recently that pigment inks as on the R2400 function much
> less satisfactorily than dye based inks for digital negatives. For this
> reason I was going to hang onto my 1290 for the time being, to dedicate to
> transparency printing. As a newbie to alternative processes, I was
> wondering what the concensus of the forum was on this subject
> John Fontana
Received on Sun Apr 9 16:52:44 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/01/06-11:10:24 AM Z CST