Katharine,
I allowed in a later post that my description of the "simple test"
was probably a bad choice of words. After almost 1/4 century working
the carbon process I sometimes forget that it can be quite
complicated. I was just trying to share with you some of the issues
that have to be considered if you plan to pursue this kind of testing.
Sandy
>Sandy,
>I was simply following your own protocol, quoted below, where you
>said you used a "heavily-pigmented" gum emulsion with saturated
>potassium dichromate to print through the back of paper, and claimed
>that with this emulsion and back-printing you got a "DMax higher
>than one could get with a single coat of gum, and ... a full range
>of tones." Now, you're saying that it's no wonder I couldn't get a
>good DMax because it's very very complicated and you can't just do
>it with a heavy pigment mix and saturated dichromate. So, I must
>admit I'm confused, and rapidly losing patience.
>Katharine
>
Received on Tue Apr 11 06:28:27 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/01/06-11:10:24 AM Z CST