Re: Pointless discussion?

From: Ender100@aol.com
Date: 04/14/06-09:06:55 AM Z
Message-id: <337.288a881.3171148f@aol.com>

Yves,

Thanks for the clarification.... just ignore what I said about negatives
then.
Mark

In a message dated 4/14/06 5:14:09 AM, gauvreau-yves@sympatico.ca writes:

>
> Mark,
>
>  
>
> just in case I wasn't clear enough, in all this below when I speak of
> transparencies it is not as negative but as main support for the gum layer and
> eventually the resulting print.
>
>  
>
> Regards
>
> Yves
>
>

Mark Nelson
Precision Digital Negatives
Received on Sat Apr 15 20:01:49 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/01/06-11:10:25 AM Z CST