Re: pinhole

From: RHobbs3@aol.com
Date: 04/18/06-05:46:03 PM Z
Message-id: <3bd.6b34d4.3176d43b@aol.com>

I'm with Marek. You could use something like 700 nm for your calculation,
but I think it's a waste of time.
Rob
Received on Tue Apr 18 17:46:17 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: RHobbs3@aol.com: "Re: pinhole"
Previous message: christine shepherd: "Re: Daguerreotypes and Tintypes"
Maybe in reply to: Yves Gauvreau: "pinhole"
Next in thread: RHobbs3@aol.com: "Re: pinhole"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/01/06-11:10:25 AM Z CST