Re: Digital Negs with Dye Sublimation

From: Michael Koch-Schulte ^lt;mkochsch@shaw.ca>
Date: 04/25/06-08:22:37 PM Z
Message-id: <023301c668d8$4923deb0$a400a8c0@kitsch>

Dye-Subs are continuous tone. Perhaps that was its undoing.

~m

----- Original Message -----
From: "Katharine Thayer" <kthayer@pacifier.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: Digital Negs with Dye Sublimation

> Some years back, I had a dye-sub printer. It was long enough ago
> that I don't remember the reason(s) why I didn't find it satisfactory
> for negatives, but at that time I found that I got better digital
> negatives for gum printing from a laser printer (using stochastic
> bitmap files) rather than from the dye-sub printer. (This was of
> course in the days before inkjet printers got good enough to make
> decent digital negatives).
> Katharine
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 25, 2006, at 6:58 PM, Michael Koch-Schulte wrote:
>
> > Has anyone attempted making digital negatives using a dye-
> > sublimation printer. Does it work? ~m
> >
>
Received on Tue Apr 25 20:22:35 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/01/06-11:10:26 AM Z CST