Don
In a message dated 30/4/06 6:49:37 pm, dstevenbryant@mindspring.com writes:
>
> Three and a half hours, do you mean three and a half minutes? If you can
> achieve 2 minute exposures that harden the gum properly your UV light source
> must be extremely bright compared to mine or your negatives are extremely
> thin.
>
Not at all. The syastem I worked out for myself and have been using and
teaching for the last thirty years, needs far shorter exposure and development
times.
>I've just looked at your web site and I see nothing there that explains how
to make or print digital negatives for gum, not even close<
That Don is because it is so simple. If you don't need special curves then
all you have to do is forget that the inverted print is digital..
I have been handing this stuff out free for thirty years. Now I am getting
thousands of hits a week and a signifivcant amount of megs taken in downloads, I
am preparing a number of manuals for download, but for a fee.
Terry
.
>
> >
> At the risk of being called pompous, there is a full explanation on my web
> site. I will be bring the word to Pittsburgh next spring. I am planning my
> workshops for the next few months at the moment.
>
Received on Mon May 1 00:21:15 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/01/06-11:10:27 AM Z CST