Re: Sorry to ask again but...

From: Sandy King <sanking_at_clemson.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:54:24 -0400
Message-id: <a0602041fc11b80c5fa5d@[192.168.2.3]>

I see two primary advantages of fluid mounting. One is the
elimination of Newton rings, which can be a problems with some films
(TMAX-100 for example) even when scanning emulsion down on glass.
Another is an increase in micro-contrast. It is the increase in
micro-contrast that appears to give more apparent sharpness.

Sandy

>Thanks for all the info Sandy, which makes a lot of sense...But now
>I wonder, if the focus is so good (as with the tintype, etc.) why
>the oil? Is that only about Newton rings? If so, honestly, that
>poof with cornstarch is a piece of (so to speak) cake.
>
>PS. I'll clip that article from the Times, Sandy, and mail it if
>you don't find it. I think it's not nice, however-- I recall
>"lawsuit" in the headline.
>
>I'd totally forgotten Carmen with the scanner, Don -- you are a
>phenomenon! That portrait might have been somewhat soft, and maybe
>even out of kilter... but, it was several inches distant and
>probably not a high end instrument (which is to say, just enough
>"effect" for "art").
>
>J.
Received on 08/30/06-11:55:19 AM Z

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 09/01/06-12:02:08 PM Z CST