Dan,
As usual, I don't mind jumping into the quicksand, but, I would agree with you
—I had not heard of the process of inkjet (pigment inks) & PT/PD prior to
your doing it.
I think Terry King was confused regarding terminology, what was being
discussed in the combo thread and Chris's comment. His article in View Camera was
on gum & PT/PD. There may have been something different about his method for
gum with PT/PD, but I've seen some pretty old gum + PT/PD prints.
Now would someone please throw me a rope and haul me outta this quicksand?—
and I don't mean one to hang myself with either heheheheh
Best Wishes,
Mark I. Nelson
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com
PDNPrint Forum @ Yahoo Groups
In a message dated 2/5/06 3:57:47 PM, fdanb@aol.com writes:
> I won’t jump into the “who did it first” quicksand but I can tell you
> that I announced the process (on this list even) in the summer of 2001
> and was producing (and distributing) actual P.O.P. prints at that time.
>
Received on Sun Feb 5 16:46:45 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/13/06-10:42:57 AM Z CST