Hello all,
Several people have already commented on this in from a practical point 
of view. I would like to add a couple of more basic comment to the 
discussion.
1. As long as we are dealing with processes with sensitivity well 
outside the visible range, I do not think that spectral sensitivity can 
be judged by the visible colour of the negative.
2. The colour of a pigment may or may not give an indication of its UV 
spectrum. There is simply no way of knowing how a pigment will perform 
in UV based on visible colour. (A lot can be learned by studying 
published spectra for the pigments in question, though).
3. As far as blue/green from the printer, these colours (if pigmented 
inks) are likely to be composed of one or more of the phtalocyanine 
pigments. I only have visible light spectra for these (PB 15/74160 and 
PG 36/74265, from Ralph Mayer: The artist's handbook of materials and 
techniques, 5th ed., 1991). Both of these phtalocyanines are very dense 
at 400nm, and unless they have transmission peaks in the UV range, they 
will be nearly as dense as orange or red pigments as far as UV is 
concerned.
I don't think it is possible to draw any conclusion about the spectral 
sensitivity of these processes based on the visible colour of the 
negative. A practical test would be to do a series of exposures using 
negs with different colours, but no UV from the light source (UV-filter 
over white light fluorescent tubes?). Since I have a UV-exposure unit, 
I'm not inclined to do this, but I'm always curious...
Best regards,
Tom Einar Andersen
Ps. I'd be very interested if someone knows where to find 
UV/VIS/IR-spectra for pigments.
TERRYAKING@aol.com wrote:
>  
> Most of us use UV for the iron processes such as cyanotype and 
> platinum/palladium.
>  
> Herschel established in 1842 that UV is not necessary for cyanotype and 
> Michael Maunder has recently conducted tests to confirm this. In an Il 
> Laborario meeting recently, David Harris suggested using green inks 
> rather than red for making negatives on Translucent II. This seemed to 
> work very well for platimum/palladium solutions. What do people 
> consider  the implications of this to be for the spectral sensitivity of 
> platinum/palladium ?
>  
> Terry
Received on Tue Feb 21 11:12:59 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/13/06-10:42:58 AM Z CST