Re: palladium drydown and developer (albumen & collodion)

From: Peter Marshall <petermarshall_at_cix.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:28:50 +0100
Message-id: <44C26052.7060805@cix.co.uk>

I can't understand people who apparently use a computer that doesn't
have a delete key and an e-mail program that doesn't have twit filtering
facilities :-)

I also find it hard to see that Terry has broken the 'rules' so that he
might be banned.

Easy to see his contribution to alt photo though, through organising
various events, spreading the gospel and the discovery of new methods
which I think will eventually become very important in alt printing.

Regards

Peter Marshall
petermarshall@cix.co.uk
_________________________________________________________________
My London Diary http://mylondondiary.co.uk/
London's Industrial Heritage: http://petermarshallphotos.co.uk/
The Buildings of London etc: http://londonphotographs.co.uk/
and elsewhere......

Don Bryant wrote:
> Terry,
>
>
>
> Why do you manage to suggest that everyone else is wrong and you are right?
> My question is meant rhetorically, you need not answer.
>
>
>
> I'm not going to waste any time and get to the point with my message today.
>
>
>
> It's time for you to go, that is, to be banned from this list.
>
>
>
> I vote we kick you and your drivel off the "island."
>
>
>
> I therefore request that Gordon place you in exile once again.
>
>
>
> I know others on this list, who feel the same as I, are not likely to make a
> public disclosure of their disgust with your behavior. I would encourage
> them to send a private e-mail to Gordon requesting your dismissal from the
> list ASAP.
>
>
>
> BTW, as far as the B&S list goes, you've pulled the same crap over there for
> years; frankly I don't think they are interested in your participation there
> either.
>
>
>
> Don Bryant
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: TERRYAKING@aol.com [mailto:TERRYAKING@aol.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 9:48 AM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> Subject: Re: palladium drydown and developer (albumen & collodion)
>
>
>
>
>
> Witho
>
> I have been teaching alternative processes very successfully for a very long
> time.and I have given a hell of a lot.. There are generations of students
> who will attest to this.
>
> If you had read things more carefully.you would have seen that your
> perception was wrong. You are not aware of the facts and you draw the wrong
> conclusions; this leads to your being unjustifiably offensive. But I
> suspect that was your intention.
>
> I would like to see things improve. I suggest that you prefer the status
> quo.
>
> When I joined this list it was good but later, whenever I have set anything
> up, such as APIS, somebody on this list attacked it. This is true not just
> for me but is true for many others who would leave as they could not see the
> point in putting up with this kind of nonsense. They had better things to
> do.
>
> Somebody, who is a subscriber to this list has told me that the way I have
> neen treated in the last week or so was 'absolutely disgusting'. In fact
> it was like being in a school playground. .
>
> I am a good teacher and have developed and suggested methods that are now
> common in discussions on this list but now, when I suggest a way of doing
> things, instead of accepting that it is a legitimate approach open for
> discussion, it is pooh-poohed as it is not the accepted way of doing
> things. You need some intiative here, not long discussions of insignificant
> and useless details.
>
> When I suggest other ways of making sizes for platinum prints, someone tells
> me that he cannot see the point as gelatine is good for the methods he uses
> and implies that as he has not come across yellowing in albumenised paper it
> can be of no significance..Now this is significant as the person concerned
> is a guru on this list. I mention it as the most recent example. of many.
>
> When I suggest that one can make develop gum prints in seconds rather than
> hours, it is either ignored or I am told that my puddle pusher methods will
> produce 'rotten' prints. Not very helpful for those trying to learn.
>
> Recently when I made a simple comment about gum printing I got an emotional
> and irrational spiel. This is not the first time this has happened.
>
> Once, earlier, when I pointed out that a leading light had got something
> wrong I was told that I would not know what had hit me and that there would
> be blood on the carpet. I was even told that I could stay on the list if I
> did not mention gum printing. I left. and stayed away.
>
> That is why I am defensive. That is why I suggest that people should attend
> conferences such as APIS in Santa Fe or in England as that is where you can
> get a reasonable standard of discussion.That is why I, and many others do
> not 'give' as much as they might to this list. That is why I save things for
> conferences. The 'benefit' is a rational exchange of ideas. Sometimes, but
> only sometimes does one get that here
>
> Sometimes one thinks that may be a chance that things could improve but one
> is quickly dissillusioned by comments such as yours...
>
> There is a silent majority who would prefer less domination by a few and
> fewer of these silly attacks. They complain, but do nothing.
>
> This list should be a place where people of like mind can discuss things in
> an adult and informed manner. I am afraid that this is just not true . This
> list cannot be taken seriously until it is properly administered.
>
> I suggest that, if you have a serious interest in alternative photography,
> you should attend conferences, go to exhibitions and museums , and read the
> books and manuals. Incidentally, the author of one of the best manuals for
> those starting in alternative photography, who happens to be a friend of
> mine, joined this list but left quickly when all he got was insults. I hope
> that you take the point.
>
> This list has given others a bad name but if anyone is seeking a reasonable
> level of discussion go to
>
> the B&S web site
>
> or
>
> artaltphoto@yahoogroups.co.uk
>
> Incidentally , the answer to the yellowing problem is that one uses an
> organic rather than a mineral acid for clearing. It is in the manuals.
>
>
>
>
> Terry
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 22/07/2006 10:21:47 GMT Daylight Time, info@witho.nl
> writes:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello Terry,
>
>
>
> Why do you invite everybody to a conference or a workshop in stead of
> sharing what you know in this forum. Like this albumen question you again
> play your hide and seek game. You mention a problem (yellowing) which you
> have overcome but in stead of sharing how you start an argument (in a
> lengthy way). Just tell on list what is your solution to a problem in stead
> of referring to literature, experience and testing. All people acquire
> information the same way as you. So help the inexperienced in stead of
> telling them over and over that you have found a better solution. If you
> want to help people with their attitude towards learning do it of list. If
> you want to contribute with wisdom do it straight forward without hesitation
> and without the expectancy of benefit. If you feel that you have achieved it
> to be a master or a teacher behave like one.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Witho
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on 07/23/06-12:04:21 AM Z

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 08/31/06-12:23:48 PM Z CST