Gu,
maybe at normal usage, where there is an interval between exposures, it all
cools down and you get the same response each time?
Best Wishes,
Mark Nelson
To NSA: When you read this email, would you please search your database for
my other black sock?
Precision Digital Negatives--The Book
PDNPrint Forum at Yahoo Groups
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
In a message dated 6/11/06 11:29:12 PM, guruguhan@hotmail.com writes:
> Hey Mark,
>
> Thanks. I guess I just thought the light would come on faster than what I
> was expecting with metal halide, I don’t know where I got that presumption. I
> understand that the integrator accounts for this, how can I test if the
> integrator is measuring accurately (if the photo diode is a dud)? Or is it ok as
> long as it is consistently inaccurate (I’d rather avoid this).
>
> I read another archive thread by Sandy where he had an issue exposing four
> sheets of the same neg in a row, where the fourth sheet showed much more
> density than the first. John Cremati made a few comments, among them saying that
> one could add a manual shutter using aluminum.
>
> When does one know to pull the shutter (I guess you need to do testing to
> find out when your bulb has reached its maximum output?). I’m just curious
> about this, I don’t think I’ll be in a situation where I’ll be printing in such
> succession for a while.
>
> Thanks again,
> Gu
>
Received on 06/12/06-07:58:04 PM Z
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 07/28/06-08:55:13 AM Z CST