Re: toning "lumen" prints

Chirs,
Yes, I used regular chlorobromide enlarging papers like Forte warm tone.
Most likely other warm tone papers will work as well. There is a lot of
chlorobromide enlarging papers on the mrket, perhaps Agfa multocontrrast is
like that, can't remember it now. Nice thing about it is to try and see what
happens, a lot of surprising results will come out. Even pure brimide papers
will work, but with different tones. Soak the print after exposure in water,
then tone in your favorite toner. Fix in 5% thiosulfate.
The POP papes are silver chloride sensitized with silver nitrate. I tried
sensitizing regular enlarging papers with silver nitrate and it increases
sensitivity. The image appears quickly, but I was not happy with end
results.
Marek

>From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
>Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>Subject: Re: toning "lumen" prints
>Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:01:39 -0600
>
>Marek,
>I am using regular enlarging paper, not standard silver chloride paper...I
>know that the standard POP paper available from, say, Chicago albumen works
>or some such place is silver chloride and everyone tones that before
>fixing, but to my understanding, most enlarging papers are a combo of
>bromide and chloride emulsions, correct? In other words, my question of
>toning doesn't relate to traditional silver chloride only papers but the
>darkroom enlarging papers like Ilford MGIV. You have made Lumen prints on
>those and toned those papers, too?? And before fixing?
>Chris
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Marek Matusz" <marekmatusz@hotmail.com>
>To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
>Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 2:27 PM
>Subject: Re: toning "lumen" prints
>
>
>>Chris,
>>The chemistry is a little different here from exposure and chemical
>>development of B&W papers. For the chemical development only latent
>>exposure needs to be formed. Very few silver atoms get reduced, not enough
>>to form a visible image.
>>For the lumen print (or any POP process) you start with a silver chloride
>>emulsion and reduce some of the silver through the photochemical means.
>>Actually you need to reduce a lot of silver. That silver is trapped in the
>>silver chloride matrix and this what gives the colour. These are the pinks
>>and plumes, etc of the POP processes (salted paper, albumen, etc). If you
>>tone it with gold at that stage you can replace some of the colloidal
>>silver with gold and preserve the color. If you do not tone and put it in
>>the fixer it will dissolve the remaining silver halide and the colloidal
>>silver trapped in it. I suppose if you expose it long enough you can
>>reduce enough silver to just fix it without toning.
>>Because colloidal gold has such a rich color varaition it adds so much to
>>lumen prints.
>>Marek
>>
>>>From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
>>>Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>>>To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>>>Subject: Re: toning "lumen" prints
>>>Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:10:41 -0600
>>>
>>>Good, Marek,
>>>I thought you might pull through for me :)
>>>I will throw that little bit of info out now.
>>>I wonder if scientifically it is true that elemental silver does not
>>>tone, but that the Lumen prints are not totally reduced to elemental
>>>silver and maybe the unreduced active silver halide still tones. I mean,
>>>you have proven that experientially lumen prints tone, so it is a moot
>>>point. But I am surprised that this source is wrong on the theoretical
>>>point. Maybe Ryuji has an answer for this?
>>>Chris
>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Marek Matusz"
>>><marekmatusz@hotmail.com>
>>>To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
>>>Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 10:50 AM
>>>Subject: RE: toning "lumen" prints
>>>
>>>
>>>>Chris,
>>>>Good to hear from you again. Lumen prints tone very well. You tone after
>>>>exposure, before fixing. Toning is very much dependent on the paper that
>>>>you use. Warm tone forte paper tone beautifully in gold or platinum
>>>>toner preserving a lot of delicate color hues that arise during long
>>>>exposures.
>>>>See some examples
>>>>http://www.alternativephotography.com/artists/marek_matusz.html
>>>>Marek, Houston
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
>>>>>Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>>>>>To: "Alt, List" <alt-photo-process-L@usask.ca>
>>>>>Subject: toning "lumen" prints
>>>>>Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 22:11:56 -0600
>>>>>
>>>>>Good evening all,
>>>>>Can't seem to shake "China time"--up late at night, sleep til noon in
>>>>>the morning...hmmmm.
>>>>>
>>>>>I slugged through 140pp of notes from time immemorial, and came across
>>>>>a statement by a very reputable black and white source who said that
>>>>>when a print exposed in the sun as per Burchfield's lumen prints
>>>>>(intense, long sun exposure, no development, just fixing, as per our
>>>>>discussion back in sept. or oct.) the silver halide is reduced to
>>>>>elemental silver, which does not tone.
>>>>>
>>>>>However, I have also in my notes from either Liam Lawless, Kees or
>>>>>someone on this list from years ago (2000?) that toning works great
>>>>>with POP paper (not traditional POP but POP you create from normal
>>>>>enlarging paper). I am way too lazy to take my print into the school's
>>>>>darkroom at the moment and see if it tones--anyone doing lumen prints
>>>>>lately can help me out here? I tend to believe Liam/Kees' statement...
>>>>>Chris
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on 06/17/06-06:24:08 PM Z