I wonder if the last sentence of the first paragraph of the following might
just as well apply to the second paragraph.
Terry
In a message dated 31/3/06 7:06:15 am, kthayer@pacifier.com writes:
Katherine
Is it possible that your last s
> Well, of course, all of this goes without saying: for each
> combination of light, dichromate, film, paper, etc etc there is a
> "best" exposure, which can easily be determined with a step wedge,
> and which produces the optimal hardening of the gum layer; anything
> less than that exposure will result in less than optimal gum
> hardeningI would be very surprised if there are any gum printers
> who don't know that.
>
> But my point, which I wonder if you've missed, was that this
> "best" exposure is different for every system of equipment,
> materials, etc. It's hardly surprising that your students found that
> the same exposure worked for them, given that I would assume that
> they would be using the same equipment and materials, but surely
> you're not suggesting that 6 minutes is an optimal exposure in some
> kind of general and absolute sense.
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 31 01:23:19 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 04/10/06-09:43:47 AM Z CST