RE: oil prints

From: Witho Worms <info_at_witho.nl>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:36:04 +0200
Message-id: <000c01c67f26$3da11710$0201a8c0@uw0a59wy3s1ful>

John,

 

3% by immersion.

 

I just tried the same negative with the same exposure time for a carbon
print. The catron was very overexposed. So for the brom 240 this must have
been enough.

 

Cheers,

 

It is already time for tea.

 

Witho

 

 

  _____

Van: John Grocott [mailto:john.grocott403@ntlworld.com]
Verzonden: woensdag 24 mei 2006 13:22
Aan: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Onderwerp: Re: oil prints

 

Hi Witho, What is the % strength of your sensitizer and how is it applied
to the fixed out Bergger 240? Brushing or by immersion? Exposure times
might have something to do with the question, too.

         Woof, woof. Have a good day. John.

----- Original Message -----

From: Witho Worms <mailto:info@witho.nl>

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 10:53 AM

Subject: RE: oil prints

 

Hello John,

 

I wanted to try it as both a final support for carbon prints and as a
support for oil prints. Besides it is a very beautifull, thin paper with a
matte surface. It shopuld work because it is an unhardened paper. So maybe
my fixer formulary is not right. Well, it was meant to uncomplicated my
workflow but until now it does not.

Barking at the dog helps to.

 

Regards,

 

Witho

 

  _____
Received on 05/24/06-05:36:50 AM Z

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 06/23/06-10:10:53 AM Z CST