Re: Call for Entries
I don't think the issue is difficulty of understanding the original
post. I didn't have much issue when I read the call for entries the
first time, but as I read it again, it became increasingly
bothering. The biggest issue I have is emptiness of the content. All
of us know it very well that photography can be used to represent
something untrue, and so what is new here? Also, how does this relate
to the traditional definition (and the "new definition") of photography?
I would like to see more solid writing on the concept of the
exhibition and jury criteria.
"Truth is irrelevant as long as the story is entertaining."
(A line from "Rashomon," Kurosawa, 1950.)