U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: Arches Aquarelle and Gum

Re: Arches Aquarelle and Gum



Things went from bad to worse. The first problem was that when the Arches
Aquarelle dried it dried very warped. My intent was to start with a
cyanotype II blue layer first. Bad choice, completely pocked marked with
yellow spots, then I noticed things (like brown-green cobwebs) floating in
the wash water. Yuck!. It all went into the bin. I think it might work for a
one-coat process that didn't require multiple soakings. I switched to
Fabriano Artistico late into the evening and it looked much more promising.
Thx.

~m

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Katharine Thayer" <kthayer@pacifier.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 12:41 AM
Subject: Re: Arches Aquarelle and Gum


> Hi Michael,
>
> Yeah, Arches 88 isn't a good paper for gum.
>
> Arches Aquarelle has changed over time;  I'm not familiar with it in
> its present form (although I do use the Arches Bright White, which is
> a different paper) but for years I used a previous form of Arches
> Aquarelle,  unsized, quite successfully for tricolor gums, no
> staining whatever.  I think many gum printers have shied away from it
> since it started changing in a not good direction about the end of
> the century.
>
> Katharine
>
>
> On Feb 18, 2007, at 9:19 PM, Michael Koch-Schulte wrote:
>
> > Thanks Judy. Not the answer I wanted to hear, in fact it made me
> > howl a
> > four-letter-word familiar to many New Yorkers. But good to know. The
> > mottling receded a bit but I think it's just the way they make the
> > paper. On
> > a side note I tried sizing a sheet of Arches 88 and it went right
> > throught
> > it, it looked like typing paper in hot candle wax. Translucent.
> > Probably a
> > trip to the Artists Emporium tomorrow...
> > ~m
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Judy Seigel" <jseigel@panix.com>
> > To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
> > Cc: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 10:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: Arches Aquarelle and Gum
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Michael Koch-Schulte wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Anyone offer opinions on using Arches Aquarelle with gum. I'm giving
> >>>
> > some a
> >
> >>> good hot soak right now and it looks like it "mottles" (sizing?)
> >>> in the
> >>>
> > 140F
> >
> >>> temperature water. Is this bad? I'm just out of Rives right now. I
> >>>
> > haven't
> >
> >>> see much mention of this paper in the archives in the context of
> >>> gum.
> >>>
> > Thx.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Michael,
> >>
> >> I hesitate to say this because it's many years since I've used
> >> that paper,
> >> and they seem to change every few years (they keep the name &
> >> change the
> >> paper). I found that in its "natural" state it was probably the WORST
> >> paper for gum I'd ever used, including typing paper, in that it
> >> stained
> >> VERY badly, BUT -- with a good coat of added gelatin size,
> >> hardened, it
> >> was quite fine.
> >>
> >> As for mottling -- I've found that, for whatever reasons, certain
> >> papers
> >> will mottle during the sizing process, but once they're sized and
> >> hardened
> >> the mottling disappears.
> >>
> >> Judy
> >>
> >
> >
>