RE: "hydrocote" is spelled.....(?)

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: "hydrocote" is spelled.....(?)
From: Dave S <fotodave@dsoemarko.us>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:44:10 -0500
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <C37F4B60.26B%mail@loris.medici.name>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <01d701c838eb$a9de0930$0216a8c0@DSPERSONAL><C37F4B60.26B%mail@loris.medici.name>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Thread-index: Acg4wagX5tBDs6S0Edy31AAWy6TbOwAKTobgAAJUhBUAARfnEA==

> It gives a hard, 
> impermeable surface but it looks quite flexible in the same 
> time. (I guess it should be that way, since wood is not a 
> quite dimensionally stable material - if I'm not mistaking.)

That is a good point. It means that the manufacturer has to take or has
taken that into consideration.


Dave

References:
- RE: "hydrocote" is spelled.....(?)
  - From: Dave S <fotodave@dsoemarko.us>
- Re: "hydrocote" is spelled.....(?)
  - From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>