U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?

Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?



I like that, I little humor can go a long way to improve the quality of our
lives.

Thanks
Yves


----- Original Message -----
From: "John Grocott" <john.grocott403@ntlworld.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 5:28 AM
Subject: Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?


> My French lady frind used to ask me, ''Veu tu une petite pipe avec moi,
> cherie ? ''
> The strange thing was neither she nor I were smokers  !
>
> Jean.  Photographiste - Londres - Angleterre
>
............................................................................
...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sandy King" <sanking@clemson.edu>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:34 AM
> Subject: RE: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?
>
>
> > Also, "voulez vous coucher avec moi ce soir" is a lot more than five
> > words.
> >
> > Sandy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 10:25 PM -0400 12/19/07, BOB KISS wrote:
> >>Mes Chere Judy,
> >> Vous avez tort!  Nous pouvon parler francais bien!
> >> JE T'EMBRASSE!
> >> BUB
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Judy Seigel [mailto:jseigel@panix.com]
> >>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:08 PM
> >>To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> >>Cc: alt-photo-process-error@sask.usask.ca
> >>Subject: Re: OT: 16 bit editing myth or reality?
> >>
> >>Yves wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>  You see I speek french and however hard I try to think in english (as
> >>> one
> >>>  should), when it comes to explaining conceptual stuff I just can't
and
> >>> it
> >>>  become extremely difficult for me to find the proper words in the
> >>> proper
> >>>  way. The time I loose doing this, I usually loose track of what I was
> >>>  thinking. This simple reply took me close to 2 hours to write believe
> >>> it
> >>or
> >>>  not. You can imagine I get frustated quite a lot, not at you all but
at
> >>>  myself and I think it shows sometime and I have to retry several time
> >>before
> >>>  I get it right so the folk here can understand what I mean.
> >>
> >>
> >>Yves, you're doing just fine in English -- no need to apologize.
Imagine
> >>how the Amurcans would be doing in French -- could they string 5 words
> >>together? (beyond voulez vous...that is).
> >>
> >>J.
> >>
> >>__________ NOD32 2735 (20071220) Information __________
> >>
> >>This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> >>http://www.eset.com
> >
>