Re: SPE and alt update

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: SPE and alt update
From: Jack Brubaker <jack@jackbrubaker.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:52:02 -0400
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;s=beta;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;bh=JjVzP254KdAWbDgW95y06EyHw4pqRLvgdG11FZbC7b0=;b=UY1ImpEQ/bRDnZwyfh2kD8NVFYfecoCsQikn9/gycIT6k7FUf8PXT3CBzILSkkCg2erXhFX65b3jJTFgzu2vUpZ2/+62M8/JKtaDUmMfekx1HLpB77uiZdzDaAEqPV+1LmjoV7EwhVYEuU9tL98BY8IcYlR/a2023CpPJ7yeJmQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;b=bzMGE11/fPtlfgjsYkX9itowKDwBO+aEVShc9K797Wc56+C50gmWrKimlGTT32JDUTJ+udkFbFL+SVHk0mwtaLcqLJ4w58toSCCq78KZDwZi8/yWtFq4YriDuJsA7JYsbehCTrE1QKRnaAFekoV5LITdxfpt96zaILCdg9mrGhs=
In-reply-to: <1F9AFAB9-3929-4EB3-82BA-4B590EF3B6EC@aol.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <005a01c89469$4c77dda0$0200a8c0@DC5YX7B1><045701c8947f$7d7c6180$78752480$@net><2de1e7ed0804030852k73126911h3cf688fa200093f8@mail.gmail.com><824e57b20804031245w989dcf6g9489f0b6d7caec7e@mail.gmail.com><1F9AFAB9-3929-4EB3-82BA-4B590EF3B6EC@aol.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Sender: jwbrubaker@gmail.com

Oh Mark, don't trust me to be the arbiter of good taste! But, yes,
that sounds fine to me.

Jack



On 4/3/08, Mark Nelson <ender100@aol.com> wrote:
> Jack, I have been calling one copper plate photogravure and the other
> polymer plate photogravure. If this is not correct, I would be happy to hear
> what terms should be used.
>
>  Mark Nelson
>  www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com
>  PDNPrint Forum @ Yahoo Groups
>  www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
>  From my iPhone
>
>
>  On Apr 3, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Jack Brubaker <jack@jackbrubaker.com> wrote:
>
>
> >  What's wrong
> >
> > > with calling them "photo gravures"?
> > >
> >
> > The craft of making copper photo gravure plates is more complex and
> > offers many more ways of manipulating the image. It is an
> > accomplishment to make a good copper image. Anyone who has mastered
> > the copper process would want to keep the historical term "photo
> > gravure" for their work and not see a new process that relies on a
> > manufactured plate that streamlines the process claim the same name.
> >
> > Jack
> >
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: Jon Lybrook <jon@terabear.com>

References:
- SPE and alt update
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
- RE: SPE and alt update
  - From: Richard Sullivan <richsul@earthlink.net>
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: SusanV <susanvoss3@gmail.com>
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: Jack Brubaker <jack@jackbrubaker.com>
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: Mark Nelson <ender100@aol.com>