Re: Stock Paint:Gum Solutions?
 
 
This discussion about baume, concentration etc. periodically returns on the 
list. I myself have had some difficulties the first time I started printing 
gum, because very often the concentration is expressed in a fake percentage, 
like 30% for a mix made from 30 g of gum plus 100 mL of water. For me, as a 
chemist, this was very puzzling because this is not 30% but 30/(30+100)= 23% 
weight/weight. Also very confusing is parts/parts, because the units of such 
parts are not declared. Is it weight/weight, or volume/volume? In the first 
case, 1+3 leads to 25% w/w, and 1+2 leads to 33% w/w. 
Dirk-Jan: your 30% gum, which is for me a 23% w/w, is very close to Kees' 
1+3 (if both parts are weights, it is my 25%) and the respective Baume 
degrees are quite consistent. 
 
Alberto 
 Hi Kees (and others), 
 
When you're tired of converting the hydrometer results to baumé: 
in the better cooking shops, you can find baumé meters that are used for 
measuring the syruppy of sugar-melts/caramel kind of mix.. 
I bought mine for about 7 euro's :-) 
My 30% gum solution (30 grams gumbrick dissolved into 100 ml distilled 
water) turned out to be 13 baumé 
 
Dirk-Jan 
 
 
 
2008/10/23 Kees Brandenburg <ctb@zeelandnet.nl> 
 
Hi Marek, 
 
That's a bit confusing. When I measured my former mix (1 part gum + 3 parts 
water) some year ago when Chris asked us about our gum mixes it turned out 
to be near 14 baumé. Now I use a heavier 1 part gum + 2 parts water mix. 
 
As I have both concentrations at hand I just (re)measured both mixes with 
my simple winemakers hydrometer. 
 
these are the results: 
 
My 1+3 mix has a specific gravity of 1.101 this is 13,3 baumé 
My 1+2 mix has a specific gravity of 1.132 this is 16,9 baumé 
 
You can lookup the baumé grades here: 
http://ilpi.com/msds/ref/baumescale.html 
 
And some pictures from the lab: 
http://polychrome.nl/techlog/gum-concentration 
 
kees 
 
 
 
On 23 okt 2008, at 16:40, Marek Matusz wrote: 
 
 Kees, 
I use 14 baume ready gum solutions (about 30% as I recall), so it is the
same as yours 1:2.
Marek
 
   
 
 
 |