Michael (zageracs@hotmail.com)
Mon, 15 Feb 1999 04:50:19 -0800 (PST)
I was using a standard flatbed (I thought it would probably not work
before I did it and was just curious). I would think a scanner used for
scanning transparencies would work fine for negatives but have never
tried it.
>From alt-photo-process-error@sask.usask.ca Fri Feb 12 10:22:56 1999
>Received: from process.sask.usask.ca by sask.usask.ca (PMDF V5.2-31
#27648)
> id <01J7NMH4HI1C9BVMT4@sask.usask.ca>
> (original mail from omirag@mail.cruzio.com); Fri, 12 Feb 1999 12:16:43
CST
>Received: from mail.cruzio.com (mail.cruzio.com [208.226.92.37])
> by sask.usask.ca (PMDF V5.2-31 #27648)
> with ESMTP id <01J7NMH0JFUK9BVNAQ@sask.usask.ca> for
> alt-photo-process-l-expand@process.sask.usask.ca
> (ORCPT rfc822;alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca); Fri,
> 12 Feb 1999 12:16:05 -0600 (CST)
>Received: from [207.251.14.14] (sa-207-251-14-14.cruzio.com
[207.251.14.14])
> by mail.cruzio.com with SMTP id KAA20106; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:15:58
-0800 (PST)
>Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:15:58 -0800 (PST)
>From: garimo <omirag@cruzio.com>
>Subject: Re: scanning negatives
>To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca,
alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>Message-id: <199902121815.KAA20106@mail.cruzio.com>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
>
>>
>>I've had some experience scanning negatives on a flat bed scanner and
>>they did not come out to well. I finally bought a film scanner for my
>>35mm negatives, which work quite well (although it was $850). I've
>
>Michael,
>I'm wondering if your scanning was on a standard flatbed or were you
>using one built for scanning transparencies?
>garimo
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Nov 06 1999 - 10:06:50