Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]

MMagid3005@aol.com
Mon, 19 Apr 1999 23:12:35 -0400 (EDT)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Larry Roohr: "Re: HEY, KODAK! Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• Previous message: Steve Shapiro: "Re: HEY, KODAK! Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• In reply to: Larry Roohr: "Re: HEY, KODAK! Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• Next in thread: Peter Mikalajunas: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"

Pete Mikalajunas: Can you give some details on how you evaluate negatives
using the scanner? -- Marty Magid

• Next message: Larry Roohr: "Re: HEY, KODAK! Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• Previous message: Steve Shapiro: "Re: HEY, KODAK! Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• In reply to: Larry Roohr: "Re: HEY, KODAK! Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"
• Next in thread: Peter Mikalajunas: "Re: Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:32