Scanner / Printer Combo for Alt. process [Was Re: costs of Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]

D.A. Saunders (dasaunders@freewwweb.com)
Wed, 21 Apr 1999 15:51:22 -0400 (EDT)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: fb: "Re: Permanence, my philosophical fussing about rc/fiber and color /silver"
• Previous message: FotoDave@aol.com: "Imagesetter Output Going Away...."
• Next in thread: Judy Seigel: "Re: Scanner / Printer Combo for Alt. process [Was Re: costs of Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"

I'm sure this has been asked a bazillion times but the question
popped into my head by what Judy mentioned so here goes . . .

What scanner / printer combinations are some of you using to create
good-quality enlarged negs successfully? Any inkjets out there?
(Enlarged meaning not smaller than 8x10 and perhaps up to say
11x14 or maybe even 16x20).

Also, Judy, what is the 18x22 inkjet you refer to?

Thanks for your input . . . er . . . (output) . . .

Daryl

At 01:21 AM 04/20/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>[snip] PS. Since you can now get an 18 by 22 inch inkjet for about $500 (put
>it on the Visa), you don't probably really need a service bureau either..
>and that's less than 3 boxes of 14 x 17 film... How many to a box?
>Judy

• Next message: fb: "Re: Permanence, my philosophical fussing about rc/fiber and color /silver"
• Previous message: FotoDave@aol.com: "Imagesetter Output Going Away...."
• Next in thread: Judy Seigel: "Re: Scanner / Printer Combo for Alt. process [Was Re: costs of Digital is not *easier* [Was: Too much equipment]"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Oct 28 1999 - 21:39:32