From: Hamish Stewart (hamish.stewart@wanadoo.fr)
Date: 02/09/00-07:31:52 AM Z
>Subject: Re: Continuous Tone Duplicating Film @ Photo Warehouse
>Sent: 2/2/20 18:53
>Received: 9/2/0 2:37
>From: John Richardson, jrplatinum@earthlink.net
>Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>
>I know of one platinum printer here in the Los Angeles area who uses it. It
>appears to work fine, but it is even slower than the Kodak product so you
>will
>need to make sure there is no vibration in your system. The printer I know
>works 50 yards from railroad tracks, so this is an issue for him.
>
>John Richardson
>
>Vamaza@aol.com wrote:
>
>> Wondering if anyone has experimented with this film available from Photo
>> Warehouse in California. I would like to use it for making enlarged
negatives
>> direct from the original. Photo Warehouse provided elementary data on this
>> film. Any feedback will be of great assistance.
>>
>> Vasilios Zatse
>> vamaza@aol.com
>
If this is film is slow and the photo warehouse slower... I have used the
Kodak product. - normal exposures at at least 40 secs, often some minutes
at f5.6... I don't know what developer you are using, but depending on
the process you might want to consider kodak D-19. A high enery dev that
should provide the density that you need..
Cheers
Hamish
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hamish Stewart - Gum Bichromate Photographer - visit
<http://perso.wanadoo.fr/hamish/gumphoto.html>
for gum bichromate images, technical information and links to recommended
resources on alternative photographic processes.
mailto:<gum_photo@wanadoo.fr>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 04/24/00-04:37:09 PM Z CST