Re: Digital Negatives -- baby question

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: Digital Negatives -- baby question
• From: "Jeffrey D. Mathias" <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net>
• Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 18:16:56 -0400
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• References: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0007041738460.6992-100000@panix2.panix.com>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

Judy Seigel wrote:
> ... Apparently the software had 16 bit scanning as the
> default. But when I got it into Photoshop, the program would inform me it
> couldn't do a thing above 8 bits. ...
>  I'd be curious for a REALLY elementary
> explanation of what use the extra bits are ...

There are some good explinations by Wayne Fulton at:

http://www.scantips.com/index.html#menu

and look at:

http://www.scantips.com/basics14.html

-- 
Jeffrey D. Mathias
http://home.att.net/~jeffrey.d.mathias/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Digital Negatives -- baby question
    • From: Gary Miller <gmphotos@earthlink.net>

• References:
  • Digital Negatives -- baby question
    • From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: Digital Negatives with enough Tones for Pt/Pd
• Next by Date: Re: Kallitypes not recognized.
• Prev by thread: Digital Negatives -- baby question
• Next by thread: Re: Digital Negatives -- baby question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread