Re: Kallitypes not recognized.

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: Kallitypes not recognized.
• From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
• Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 18:14:57 -0400 (EDT)
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• In-reply-to: <20000704154108.EGHS6544.mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com@[24.20.80.96]>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Jack Fulton wrote:
> 
> However, I do believe that the quality of kallitypes well made, is such that
> the average person aware of what these prints might look like, could easily
> confuse the two.


Jack, there's no doubt kallitype is very similar in appearance to pl-pt,
tho in my experience more beautiful, since deep tones are often deeper,
and color (IMO) better... the *doubt* is archivality... !!!!!

Judy

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Kallitypes not recognized.
    • From: Steve Shapiro <sgshiya@redshift.com>

• References:
  • Kallitypes not recognized.
    • From: Jack Fulton <jefulton1@home.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: Digital Negatives -- baby question
• Next by Date: Re: Fw: Potassium Chlorate - effect on Pt/Pd
• Prev by thread: Re: Kallitypes not recognized.
• Next by thread: Re: Kallitypes not recognized.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread