Re: Permanence of dye-sub prints

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: Permanence of dye-sub prints
• From: Bob Wier <wier@calcite.rocky.edu>
• Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:06:19 -0700
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• In-reply-to: <38C754A5.644E@pacifier.com>
• References: <v04011701b4ebee183212@[195.121.188.155]><38C527CC.3EF0A020@uswest.net> <01BF8429.47746840.akerbs@HIDDEN.com><4.2.0.58.20000309003417.00c53220@mail.earthlink.net>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

>This is contrary to my personal experience with dye-sub prints. I got
>rid of my dye-sub printer after finding to my horror that the  prints
>were fading and color-shifting markedly within just a few months in
>indirect daylight. It was the cyan dye that faded the most, leaving the
>prints mostly yellow and magenta. Maybe it was the particular printer

I have a rather old FARGO dye sub printer (which prints 4*5). Prints
from circa 1995 still look fine, although they are kept in a relatively
dark environment.

THANKS

              Bob Wier
     mailto:wier@calcite.rocky.edu
   12:05 PM Friday, March 10, 2000
        Unix/Internet Administrator
   Rocky Mountain College, Billings MT.
 keeper of the Photo-3d and Overland-Trails
mailing lists and the USA GPS Waypoint server

• References:
  • Xerox transfer et al
    • From: henk thijs <henk.thijs@hetnet.nl>
  • Neo-Intro and questions?
    • From: mmorrill2 <mmorrill2@uswest.net>
  • RE: Digital b/w negs
    • From: Art Kerbs <akerbs@HIDDEN.com>
  • Re: Xerox transfer et al
    • From: Sil Horwitz <silh@earthlink.net>
  • Re: Permanence of dye-sub prints
    • From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: Xerox transfer et al
• Next by Date: Re: about papermaking (off topic ...maybe)
• Prev by thread: Re: Permanence of dye-sub prints
• Next by thread: Re: Digital b/w negs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread