[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Epson or HP for alt-phot ... ? (some OT)
Jeffrey,
Maybe in your haste to respond, you missed the words "perhaps" and
"probably" in the post by Mitch. Had you seen these, I'm sure you would
have realized that this WAS an opinion and not a citable point of fact.
You get up in the wrong side of the bed today?
Mitch Valburg wrote:
>...
>On the other hand, the print head in a cartridge that you purchase for $30
>and
>costs perhaps $3-5 to manufacture is probably built to a much lower
>standard of
>tolerances than one which must last through the entire warranty period,
>especially when you factor in the more self-destructive nature of heat
>driven
>(HP) technology as compared to piezoelectric technology (Epson).
>...
Do you have some proof or evidence to back up such claims or is this
just conjecture (as I suspect)?
Perhaps one is best informed if they collect information on the printers
and the technologies themselves from reliable sources.
As a favor to us all, such claims should cite a source of reference. If
not, it can be assumed to be personal opinion.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com