From: Joachim (joachim@microdsi.net)
Date: 09/28/00-08:50:11 PM Z
Just received #5. Invaluable. Thank you. Joachim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Judy Seigel [mailto:jseigel@panix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 1:06 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Dags info
>
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Jack Fulton wrote:
>
> > ... the "safer" process used by Jerry Spagnoli called
> > Becquerel.
>
> According to Bob Schramm's article in Post-Factory #4 titled, "How an Old
> Alternate-Process Printer from a Small Town in West Virginia Learned to
> Make a Daguerreotype," the problem with the Becquerel version of
> daguerreotype is that it's much slower.
>
> But Bob shows in extended description and photos how he set up fume hood,
> fuming box, mercury pot, controls, etc. for safe dag at home. Of course
> Bob is an exemplar of both theory and hand-toolery, but many folks have
> made similarly safe workshops. The process is, if not quite a CRAZE, in
> full revival.
>
> I will shortly do a rundown on Post-Factory #5, just mailed, with info on
> how to get it as "free introductory" copy for cost of the postage. But
> whoever is interested in the dag article can have #4 similarly. If you're
> in US or Canada send $1.50 US (check, stamps, or nicely wrapped money).
> From overseas, two International Reply coupons should cover it ($3
> airmail, $2 surface to Europe)... Indicate "#4" and mail to:
>
> Post-Factory Press, 61 Morton Street, New York, NY 10014
>
> Judy
>
> .................................................................
> | Judy Seigel, Editor >
> | World Journal of Post-Factory Photography > "HOW-TO and WHY"
> | info@post-factory.org >
> | <http://rmp.opusis.com/postfactory/postfactory.html>
> .................................................................
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 10/01/00-12:09:00 PM Z CDT