Re: Arches Platine

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: Arches Platine
• From: "luc@sotolgallery.com" <luc@sotolgallery.com>
• Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:27:43 -0500
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• In-reply-to: <002b01c0c2ac$71021820$4fa702d0@jportale>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022

on 4/11/01 12:25 PM, Joe Portale at jportale@gci-net.com wrote:

> I use Platine for several processes. It does not need any extra sizing for
> Pt/Pd, kallitype or salted paper.  What do you mean by how does it look when
> dry?

Thanks Joe. Some paper look 'dull' after processing and washing. Arches
makes a nice watercolor paper, in the 90# if memory serves, which look crisp
and warm and doesn't look at all like that after. Hence my question...

/ln
-- 
mailto:luc@sotolgallery.com
http://www.sotolgallery.com

• References:
  • Re: Arches Platine
    • From: Joe Portale <jportale@gci-net.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: Arches Platine
• Next by Date: Re: Arches Platine
• Prev by thread: Re: Arches Platine
• Next by thread: Re: Arches Platine
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread