Re: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?
• From: sstoney@pdq.net (shannon stoney)
• Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 08:09:39 -0500
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

Carl wrote:

>
>.05 for zone III isn't overexposed. That's actually on the thin side for
>*fully detailed* shadows which is what goes in zone III. If detailed
>highlights (zone VII) are at 1.8 then you may have long scale negatives that
>sound quite suitable for Pt/Pd, but the only way to find out for sure is to
>print some of them.

The thing is, the shadows in Zone III have a density of 0.5, not .05.  Is
that too dense?

--shannon

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?
    • From: Andre Fuhrmann <Andre.Fuhrmann@uni-konstanz.de>

• Prev by Date: Re: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?
• Next by Date: the true destiny of negatives
• Prev by thread: Re: correction Re: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?
• Next by thread: Re: a lot of over-exposed negatives: what to do?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread