Re: preshrink was register p/negs

From: Dave Rose (photo@wir.net)
Date: 02/05/01-08:02:34 AM Z

• Next message: Bill Collins: "New exposure unit idea"
• Previous message: Judy Seigel: "But how about Nu-Arc (for Nu-Yorker) ?"
• In reply to: Peter Fredrik: "preshrink was register p/negs"
• Next in thread: Judy Seigel: "Re: preshrink was register p/negs"
• Reply: Judy Seigel: "Re: preshrink was register p/negs"
• Reply: Peter Fredrik: "Re: preshrink was register p/negs"

Pete wrote:

(snip)
> So Dave if you gave your paper this pre shrink treatment firstly ,you
would
> not need your paper size adjustment technique with the possible risk of
pigment
> staining.

Prior to the first printing, my paper is soaked in water and dried
(pre-shrink treatment), dipped twice in a Knox gelatin solution and dried
(sizing), and dipped once into formaldehyde and dried (hardening). The
problem is due to changes in relative humidity, and is unrelated to any
pre-shrink treatment.

Best regards,
Dave Rose
Powell, Wyoming

• Next message: Bill Collins: "New exposure unit idea"
• Previous message: Judy Seigel: "But how about Nu-Arc (for Nu-Yorker) ?"
• In reply to: Peter Fredrik: "preshrink was register p/negs"
• Next in thread: Judy Seigel: "Re: preshrink was register p/negs"
• Reply: Judy Seigel: "Re: preshrink was register p/negs"
• Reply: Peter Fredrik: "Re: preshrink was register p/negs"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 03/06/01-04:55:38 PM Z CST