rgw@mediaone.net
Date: 07/10/01-01:23:26 PM Z
If it is just about spraying ink (21st century Jackson Pollock?) then shouldn't
Inkjet then be relegated to some painting list some where?
Seriously though, the Inkjet crowd has several nice lists of their own to play on.
This seems to be the only place to go for platinum, palladium, gum, cyanotype etc.
Why can't we leave it at that?
For those of us who have tried the inkjet approach and found it wanting, it is nice
to have a place where such frivolity is avoided as the consumerist diversion that it
is and traditional methods are still respected.
Guy
Richard Morris wrote:
> Think about it! Ink jet printing is merely another way of applying colours
> to a surface. Only rather than use a brush you use nozzles - like
> mechanical cake icing. Its what goes into making it than counts.
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:49:18 -0400 "Jeffrey D. Mathias"
> <jeffrey.d.mathias@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> > Bob Maxey wrote:
> > > >>Does anyone consider inkjet prints to be alt-photo?
> > > ... To answer your question, ALT is anything other than conventional silver
> > > systems we have had for decades. Ink-jet is an Alternative process in my
> > > view. ...
> >
>
> Richard Morris
> Brunel University, UK
> dtsrrlm@brunel.ac.uk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 08/02/01-11:56:46 AM Z CST