From: Christine (acolyta@napc.com)
Date: 10/25/01-10:27:12 AM Z
Hi Katherine et al,
Thanks for responding. I was more unsure if my post reached the list
because I kept getting my post returned with an address unknown error and
wanted to be sure it was making it to you all. I was hoping my reply to
address would prevent unwanted spam, but I might have to change it if its
preventing wanted reponses from list folks!
Now that I know that the 1160 is not the be-all end-all of epson printers,
perhaps I'll be looking more closely at the newer 6 color printers that may
be able to take third party inks.
Thanks,
Christine
Katharine Thayer wrote:
> Christine wrote:
> >
> > hey did y'all get this or my post regarding epsons?
> >
> > --
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > to reply, remove "damnspam"
>
> Hi Christine,
>
> We got them. It's too bad you set up the reply-to the way you did, since
> it replies not to the list but to your address with the damnspam word
> inserted in it, which very few people are going to notice they need to
> take that out. So there may well have been replies that just never got
> to you.
>
> You'll find different opinions on this, like most everything. One thing
> to be aware of, however; the 1160 is no longer available. Its main point
> of appeal was that it was compatible with the Cone Edition piezo inkset
> and software, which a bunch of people here were all excited about for a
> while, but from more recent posts on the subject it sounds like it's not
> all it was cracked up to be. I would suggest one of the 6-ink models,
> since I've been happy with both of those I've used although neither of
> them are available any longer; the last current model I knew about was
> the 1280 but there may be something newer now. Good luck,
> Katharine
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ to reply, remove "damnspam"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 11/02/01-08:55:27 AM Z CST